A recent spate of California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) enforcements has pushed consumer opt-outs to the fore, clarifying what regulators consider important, Cynthia Cole, an intellectual property lawyer at Baker McKenzie, said during a webinar Tuesday.
The California legislature passed two laws about artificial intelligence and automated decision systems on Friday, the last day for legislators to pass bills. In addition, it approved a measure on age-verification signals. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has until Oct. 12 to sign or veto the bills.
Regulating AI should center on limiting the technology's potential risks, labor representatives and other advocates said during a session of the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity. At a hearing Thursday, they said their goal includes protecting state residents from AI's possible harms while also letting them reap its benefits.
While there are state and federal protections for sensitive data, a comprehensive privacy framework at the federal level is needed to ensure all modes of data sharing are transparent, legal and regulated, panelists said Wednesday. They spoke during a Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) webinar about the federal government’s recent attempts to access state data.
Discussing how privacy issues intersect with a company’s growth goals and how they permeate the organization is key to having a strong privacy policy and earning consumer trust, said TrustArc executives during a Tuesday webinar the compliance vendor hosted.
The variety in privacy laws and standards give companies some flexibility in how consent banners are displayed on their websites, said panelists during an IAPP webinar Tuesday. But they cautioned that teams throughout an organization must understand how trackers operate on the site and what data is collected.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed to stand most of a California law that makes it illegal for internet-based services and applications to provide an addictive feed to users younger than 18, unless the operator doesn't know the user is a minor.
Safety by design is the core element to ensuring kids remain safe online while also protecting their privacy and rights, a Public Knowledge paper argues (see 2509050046). More research is needed concerning tangible harms, panelists said during a discussion Monday about the paper.
Age assurance can be a crucial step in online safety for children, so long as it’s done carefully and in a privacy-preserving way, said experts during a Public Knowledge event Monday. However, they warned that age assurance should be part of a larger response.
Though using age assurance to access certain online platforms and websites is the route policymakers frequently take hoping to protect children online, it can end up doing more harm than good, multiple privacy organizations said in recent papers and blog posts.