A Maryland bill that would establish a chief data officer for the state passed the House in a unanimous 139-0 vote Thursday and now crosses over to the Senate. It was sponsored by Del. Joseline Pena-Melnyk (D) at the request of the Department of Informational Technology.
The Vermont House Commerce Committee split 7-4 Friday to advance a bill (H-342) that echoes New Jersey’s Daniel’s Law. Supporting the bill in a livestreamed hearing prior to the vote, Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark (D) said the lesson from New Jersey is that it’s “a pretty good bill that's defensible in court.”
The Vermont Senate passed its age-appropriate design code legislation (S-69) Thursday by voice vote. It still needs approval from the House. Some Republicans objected to the bill during debate Wednesday (see 2503120045).
Washington state senators voted 36-12 Wednesday for a kids privacy bill (SB-5708).
A healthcare tweak to Kentucky’s comprehensive privacy law passed the legislature. Gov. Andy Beshear (D) will consider the bill next.
A New York Senate panel on Wednesday supported restricting biometric identifying technology in schools. The Senate Internet and Technology Committee voted by voice at a livestreamed meeting to advance S-3827 to the Education Committee.
Vermont House Judiciary Chair Martin LaLonde (D) plans on sharing multiple concerns with a bill that echoes New Jersey’s Daniel’s Law with the Commerce Committee, he said at a Judiciary meeting livestreamed Wednesday. Judiciary will punt H-342 to Commerce after hearing testimony on the measure Tuesday (see 2503110077), he said.
Vermont senators shouldn’t let Big Tech convince them to "pass their favored model of privacy legislation in lieu of stronger protections” like S-71, said a Consumer Reports (CR) official Wednesday at a livestreamed meeting.
Vermont Republicans objected to an age-appropriate design code bill (S-69) on the Senate floor Wednesday. State senators voted 25-5 to amend the bill as previously recommended by the Institutions Committee, and then voted by voice to move the bill to a third reading. That action procedurally sets up a final vote, expected Thursday.
Privacy attorneys at Parker Poe predicted more state privacy rulemakings this year in a blog post Monday. “In 2025 we will likely see a higher volume of state regulators initiating rulemakings as a federal privacy law remains evasive and federal agency activity remains unclear.”