In a unanimous vote, FCC commissioners approved Thursday a Further NPRM about improving wireless location accuracy for 911 calls. The draft FNPRM raises privacy issues.

The FCC’s new Council for National Security will focus on China, cybersecurity and emerging technologies like AI, Chairman Brendan Carr announced Thursday.

Verizon urged the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to overturn a $46.9 million penalty from the FCC for not adequately protecting subscribers’ real-time location information that commissioners approved on a 3-2 vote last year (see 2404290044). Last week, the 5th Circuit heard AT&T's oral argument against a $57 million fine the commission imposed (see 2502030050). The government defended the order in the 5th Circuit even though current FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and Republican Commissioner Nathan Simington had dissented.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said Thursday that judges will hear T-Mobile’s challenge of an $80 million penalty for allegedly not safeguarding data on customers' real-time locations (see 2501210036) on March 24, starting at 9:30 a.m. The composition of the panel that will hear the case will be revealed 30 days prior to oral argument, said a Thursday notice from the court. T-Mobile was also fined $12.2 million for violations by Sprint, which it later purchased.

Public interest groups filed in support of the FCC’s 3-2 April decision (see 2404290044) fining T-Mobile $80 million for allegedly failing to safeguard data related to customers' real-time locations. T-Mobile was also fined $12.2 million for violations by Sprint, which it later acquired. In the Telecom Act, “Congress entrusted [the FCC] with the responsibility of holding the nation’s largest telecommunications providers accountable when those carriers violate the privacy of their subscribers,” the groups said in an amicus brief. Congress intended that Section 222 "ensure that telecommunications providers would protect personal data collected from their customers, and intentionally included broad definitions and gave the Commission clear authority to interpret them as technologies evolved,” they added: “Decades later, it has become clear that one of the most sensitive categories of data that telecommunications providers collect about their customers is mobile location data.” The Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse and Public Knowledge filed the brief. They urged the D.C. Circuit to "reject T-Mobile’s arguments and hold that the text and purpose of Section 222 clearly authorize the FCC orders under review.” If carriers prevail, “they will have successfully evaded virtually all means of legal accountability for violating their customers’ privacy, including data sold to bounty hunters.” Letting carriers avoid FCC authority “will mean that there is essentially no backstop to enforcing the privacy rights Congress guaranteed consumers under the Communications Act.”

Georouting of texts to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline -- like calls to the hotline -- won't use a caller's exact physical location but be based on broader geographic data, preserving privacy, according to Lifeline administrator Vibrant Emotional Health. In a filing posted Friday (docket 18-336), Vibrant said georouting of texts would likely use identical or similar boundaries to those developed during proof of concept for voice calls, minimizing user-specific data.