Google renewed its call for a federal court to dismiss a class-action case against it that alleges the company's education products secretly harvest mass amounts of student information and data without their or their parents’ knowledge or consent. In its motion to dismiss, Google claims the plaintiffs -- parents of minor schoolchildren -- haven't alleged invasion of privacy.
Privacy Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week, in case you missed them. All articles can be found by searching the title or clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Though litigation against tracking technologies may have become excessive, it’s better to ensure your company is in compliance with all privacy statutes than to complain about abusive lawsuits, said privacy experts during a panel on the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) hosted by Troutman Amin on Monday.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday dismissed claims that shoe company Converse aided and abetted violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) when it used a Salesforce chat function. While the three-judge panel affirmed summary justice of the district court, one judge went a step further, and said the wiretapping clause of the Act should not apply to internet communications.
Privacy Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week, in case you missed them. All articles can be found by searching the title or clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
A controversial proposed change to the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) will be held until next year, said state Sen. Anna Caballero (D) during an Assembly Public Safety Committee hearing Tuesday. The committee advanced Caballero’s SB-690 to the Privacy Committee with the understanding that it will be delayed. A day earlier, the committee staff raised questions about whether SB-690 was designed to protect “mom-and-pop” businesses from frivolous lawsuits.
In a reversal, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided a privacy case against Bloomingdale's, ruling that the retailer violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) when it tracked an online shopper's movement without consent. The decision indicates the court's favorable sentiment concerning protecting citizens' privacy and a shift in its approach to the wiretapping statute, Loeb & Loeb privacy lawyer Allison Cohen blogged.
Education technology vendor Instructure renewed its request that a district court dismiss a privacy suit against it, arguing that the plaintiffs failed to allege constitutional violations or invasion of privacy, and didn't prove violations of California law.
Cookies and other tracking technologies were considered simple tools to enhance website users' experience but have become "ground zero" in the data-protection consent space, privacy and cybersecurity attorney Scott Loughlin said at a June 12 Hogan Lovells webinar.
The reasoning behind court decisions to grant or deny class certification in recent privacy cases serves to show what parts of a website are most open to lawsuits and warn businesses to ensure their privacy policies and practices are up to par, according to two Fisher Phillips blogs.